Facts About Brewer Attorneys and Advisors
Brewer Attorneys and Experts have entered into a direct lease agreement for the property at 775 Lexington Ave., which is also known as International Plaza. The address is Broadway and Waverley Avenue, between 59th Street and 60th Street, directly south of Bloomingdales. Also referred to as International Plaza, this 31-storey high-rise tower is designed by renowned architect Helmut Jahn. The lawsuits filed against defendant defendants’ Building Management LLC (DMLL) include personal injury claims, negligence claims and property damage claims. It is alleged that defendant was negligent in permitting its insured tenant to use the apartment unit and in maintaining a physical condition conducive to sustaining a premises liability claim. Further claims are that the defendant failed to make reasonable accommodations for its insured tenants, and also in keeping its tenants reasonably safe.
The leases entered into by Brewer Attorneys and Counselors cover various leased properties.
Among these are commercial leases, cooperative agreements, retail leases, long-term leases and ground level leases. Leases can be either single-year or multi-year. In the case of multi-year leases, it is expected that the shorter of the terms will be the one that will cover the plaintiff’s claims.
In many of the lawsuits involving injuries of tenants and landlords, there are questions as to whether the injuries were caused by the defendants’ negligence, or was the landlord’s breach of contract.
For example, when one of the plaintiffs’ was severely beaten on the stairs, the landlord’s response was to cover the cost of his medical bills, despite knowing that the victim had not sustained any permanent injury. As such, it can be seen that cases such as this require careful attention to both the parties’ conduct, and the lease that they have undertaken. Otherwise, it may be difficult to establish liability.
There may also be circumstances whereby it is necessary for a plaintiff to establish that the defendant has contravened the obligations that it is obligated to undertake.
This is a common approach in claims for breach of warranty. A good example is a claim that a manufacturer has refused to supply products that the client has ordered because it did not manufacture them within a reasonable time deadline. If the plaintiff can show that this breach of contract has caused injuries, then it may well open the door to significant monetary awards. However, where there is little doubt as to the cause of the breach, it is important to attempt to find the causation of the breach in the context of the manufacturing process.
There may also be situations whereby a party has breached a fiduciary duty owed to another.
These usually arise in situations such as investment, real estate transactions and professional services. It can therefore be seen that such obligations can arise in almost any situation where financial interests are involved. A common example would be where an advisor recommends a particular investment opportunity.
There are also a number of cases in which a company or brewer has acted in bad faith.
Under these circumstances it may be necessary for a plaintiff to establish that the company or brewer acted in bad faith. This requires a detailed examination of the conduct of the company or brewer and their decision-making process. This will involve an examination of internal documents and emails that reflect their business decisions. It is not enough to rely on circumstantial evidence. In the United States, it is always a required ingredient to establish bad faith.
Some brewers have tried to limit their liability in lawsuits by limiting the damages that can be claimed.
The limitation of damages in most cases is one dollar. Other brewers have attempted to circumvent the statutory limitations on beer injury claims by creating what are known as special circumstances. For instance, some brewers will only allow claims of injury if the cause of the injury was a product of the negligence or misconduct of the company’s employees or suppliers.
When a case can be demonstrated that a brewer acted in bad faith, and that action proximately caused personal injury, then there may be grounds for a claim.
Other actions, including advertising that may reasonably be expected to influence sales, and the failure to take reasonable safety precautions, may also cause personal injury claims. It is important to note that, in the United States, brewers are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which requires that they inform consumers of their rights in dealing with collectors. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for implementing and enforcing the FDCPA and for disciplining advertisers and providers of marketing campaigns that violate the Act.
